
Citation: | Zhongtao CUI, Xuesong YUAN, Xiaotao XU, et al., “Theoretical Research on a D-Band Traveling Wave Extended Interaction Amplifier,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1487–1491, 2024. DOI: 10.23919/cje.2022.00.345 |
Millimeter wave and terahertz radiation sources are finding increasing use in radar imaging, communications, medical imaging, biological research, and materials scanning [1]–[4]. Due to their high gain and wide bandwidth, vacuum electron devices are finding new traction in the development of a new generation of millimeter wave and terahertz radiation sources [5], [6].
At present, traveling wave tubes (TWTs) and extended interaction klystrons (EIKs) are two of the most commonly used vacuum electronic millimeter wave and terahertz radiation sources [7]. Both types of devices have superior performance in many aspects, however a number of technical challenges still exist. Specifically, TWTs have, comparatively, very wide bandwidths [8], [9], but their attenuation of high frequency signals increases noticeably when the operating frequency reaches terahertz band. As a result, numerous periods are needed to achieve the required high gains. In the terahertz band, the transverse dimensions of incumbent devices are typically of the order of hundreds of μm and the overall longitudinal dimensions are relatively much larger, conventional millimeter-wave and terahertz TWTs are extremely difficult, time consuming and costly to fabricate and implement. EIKs have higher gain at a same unit length, but the bandwidth is limited by the characteristics of the input and output cavities. In recent years, a variety of research institutions have made considerable progress in the development of EIKs [10]–[12]. And the Canadian CPI Company has developed and manufactured a series of millimeter-wave and terahertz EIKs. Some of the EIKs reach a relative bandwidth of 1% at Ka-band and lower frequencies, but the typical relative bandwidth of the EIKs is basically in the range of 0.1%–0.3% at W-band and above frequencies. Besides, some multi-mode EIKs have a relative bandwidth approaching 2%, but the multi-mode phenomenon results in lower signal purity, compared with single-mode EIKs [13]. In general, although notable progress has been made, bandwidth limitation at high frequency remains the most crucial technological challenge in the development of EIKs.
For the development of high-gain, yet compact millimeter wave and terahertz radiation sources, a traveling-wave extended interaction amplifier (TWEIA) is proposed in this paper. Folded waveguide structure is adopted as the input and output circuits to effectively expand the modulation bandwidth, and unequal-length slots cavities are adopted as the intermediate circuit to increase the gain.
A relative bandwidth of 1% in the D-band is sufficient for many applications [1]–[3]. The design is therefore targeted to achieve such a bandwidth within three cavities, so that the longitudinal length of the beam-wave interaction circuit could be shorter. Specifically, the beam-wave interaction circuit proposed in this paper consists of two commonly applied structures: the folded waveguide slow wave structure and unequal-length slots extended interaction cavities, as shown in Figure 1. Both the left and right sections consist of folded waveguide, which operate as the input and output of the circuit, respectively. At the end of the input section, an attenuator is attached to absorb reflected signals.
The input and output sections both operate in traveling wave mode, while the intermediate cavities operate in π-mode. The high coupling impedance, diverse central frequencies and the frequency-selective characteristics of the cavities allow the electron beam, which is preliminary modulated in the input section, to interact efficiently with the signal. It should be ensured that the operating bands of the folded waveguide structures and the cavities partially overlap, so that the beam-wave interactions occur throughout all structures. Therefore, matching the beam-wave interaction frequencies and the synchronization conditions of the two mentioned structures is of central importance.
The single-period structure of the folded waveguide is shown in the inset of Figure 2, and the structural parameters are noted as follows: waveguide port length a, waveguide port width b, electron beam channel diameter h and the length of the period P. The engineered values of these parameters are shown in Table 1, to ensure a central operating frequency of 140 GHz, which is in accordance with the overall design requirement in the D-band. The dispersion curve can be determined by modifying the phase shift on the periodic boundaries. As shown in Figure 2, the ordinate of the intersection of the 21.5 kV beam-line and the dispersion curve is approximately 140 GHz, indicating that the electron beam accelerated by this voltage can interact adequately with the operating mode near this frequency.
Parameters | Value (mm) | Parameters | Value (mm) | |
a | 1.17 | h | 0.30 | |
b | 0.20 | P | 0.80 |
The simulation is carried out under the conductivity σ=2.5×107 S/m, and the results of the S-parameters are shown in Figure 3. The S11 of the developed folded waveguide is less than 0.06 when the frequency is between 139 GHz and 141 GHz, which meets the transmission requirements in the operating bandwidth.
The structure of the extended interaction cavities is shown in Figure 4. The adjacent slots in the cavities have different width and are named as long-slots and short-slots, respectively. The slots are placed alternately along the longitudinal direction, and their widths are defined as gx1 and gx2, while the ratio of gx1 and gx2 is defined as α=gx1/gx2.
Parameters of the cavities such as coupling coefficient M, characteristic impedance R/Q, operating voltage V, and operating frequency f are all important in the design and optimization.
Coupling coefficient and characteristic impedance are defined by (1) and (2) [14], where Ez, Ws, βe and ω are the axial electric field intensity, total stored energy, wave constant and angular frequency, respectively. On this basis, the effective characteristic impedance (R/Q)·M2, which describes the strength of the electromagnetic field coupling with the electron beam, is calculated. Considering that the π-mode has higher coupling coefficient and effective characteristic impedance [15], and the frequency spacing Δf between the π-mode and the nearest competitive mode is wider, the π-mode is set as the operating mode.
RQ=(∫+∞−∞|Ez|dz)22ωWs |
(1) |
M=∫+∞−∞Ezejβezdz∫+∞−∞|Ez|dz |
(2) |
Figure 5(a) shows the change of frequency spacing Δf and effective characteristic impedance (R/Q)·M2 when α is varied. Δf increases significantly after a slight decrease, with a minimum at α= 1.03; (R/Q)·M2 first increases and reaches a peak at α= 1.18, then decreases slowly, indicating the interaction between the electron beam and the signal is the most effective when α=1.18. However, the reduction of the effective characteristic impedance is not appreciable when 1.18≤α≤1.39, so α in this range is acceptable when designing the extended interaction cavities. Figure 5(b) shows the influence of the length of the cavity gaps, denoted as gz, on the effective characteristic impedance (R/Q)·M2 and coupling coefficient M. (R/Q)·M2 increases gradually slower when 0.14 mm≤gz≤0.15mm. Taking the trend of M shown in Figure 5(b) into account, the selected value of gz is from 0.13 mm to 0.14 mm, which lies within machinable tolerances. The preliminary structural parameters of the intermediate extended interaction cavities are listed in Table 1.
As mentioned above, the interaction circuit should be compact and has a certain bandwidth and gain. Therefore, it would be more appropriate for the circuit to be composed of three idler cavities. Since the length of the period, denoted as P, is the key structural parameter that influences the central frequency [16], it is possible to obtain three cavities with diverse operating frequencies by varying P alone. The optimal values of P and other structure parameters of the cavities are listed in Table 2, and the corresponding unloaded quality factor Q0 and other high frequency characteristics of the cavities are listed in Table 3, which also shows the maximum frequency interval of the cavities is 1.19 GHz.
Parameter | Value (mm) | Parameter | Value (mm) | |
gz | 0.14 | P1 | 0.60 | |
gx1 | 0.94 | P2 | 0.58 | |
gx2 | 1.18 | P3 | 0.56 |
Parameter | Cavity 1 | Cavity 2 | Cavity 3 |
f (GHz) | 140.95 | 141.73 | 142.14 |
M | 0.612 | 0.632 | 0.626 |
(R/Q)M2 (Ω) | 43.75 | 46.01 | 41.16 |
Q0 | 369.37 | 366.68 | 352.33 |
The beam-wave interaction circuit, as illustrated in Figure 1, is composed of the two structures mentioned above. The input and output structures of the TWEIA consist of 10 folded waveguide periods each. The lengths of the drift tubes along the electron propagation direction are 0.80 mm, 2.40 mm, 1.20 mm and 0.60 mm, respectively. PIC simulations are carried out under an operating voltage of 21.5 kV, 0.3 A beam current and 5 mW input power, the conductivity is set to σ=2.5×107 S/m The results show that the maximum output power reaches 351 W at 139.7 GHz, as shown in Figures 6–8, with a gain of 48.4 dB and a relative 3-dB bandwidth over of 1%, from 139.22 GHz to 140.64 GHz.
Figure 6 shows the output power signal corresponding to the input signal of 139.7 GHz. The spectrum of the output signal is shown in the inset of Figure 6, which shows the frequency purity of the output signal at 139.7 GHz, identical to the frequency of the input signal. And Figure 7 shows the beam bunching within the structure and the electron phase space diagram when the output signal is stable.
By altering the frequency of the input signal, the impact on the frequency, output power and gain are as shown in Figure 8. The curves are typically M-shaped, and the extreme points lie at 139.7 GHz, 139.9 GHz and 140.5 GHz, respectively. From the curves in Figure 8, it can be calculated that the 3-dB bandwidth reaches 1.42 GHz (139.22–140.64 GHz).
A high gain and compact millimeter wave and terahertz radiation source amplifier is developed in this paper. Folded waveguide structures and unequal-length slots extended interaction cavities have been optimized allowing for the design of a compact beam-wave interaction circuit of a D-band TWEIA. The maximum output power of the circuit is 351 W, while only 5 mW of input power is required. With a maximum gain of 48.4 dB and a relative 3-dB bandwidth of over 1%. The bandwidth could be further extended by adding more intermediate cavities with different operating frequencies to the beam-wave interaction circuit. The developed beam-wave interaction circuit of this D-band TWEIA benefits from a shortening to 26 mm in length compared with conventional TWTs, making the electro-optical and magnetic systems considerably easier to be implemented.
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0210202), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 2021YJ0096), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61771096).
[1] |
J. H. Booske, “Plasma physics and related challenges of millimeter-wave-to-terahertz and high power microwave generation,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 15, no. 5, article no. 055502, 2008. DOI: 10.1063/1.2838240
|
[2] |
P. H. Siegel, “Terahertz technology,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 910–928, 2002. DOI: 10.1109/22.989974
|
[3] |
H. B. Wallace, “Analysis of RF imaging applications at frequencies over 100 GHz,” Applied Optics, vol. 49, no. 19, pp. E38–E47, 2010. DOI: 10.1364/AO.49.000E38
|
[4] |
A. G. Markelz, A. Roitberg, and E. J. Heilweil, “Pulsed terahertz spectroscopy of DNA, bovine serum albumin and collagen between 0.1 and 2.0 THz,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 320, no. 1–2, pp. 42–48, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00227-X
|
[5] |
G. Ulisse and V. Krozer, “W-band traveling wave tube amplifier based on planar slow wave structure,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 126–129, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/LED.2016.2627602
|
[6] |
J. H. Booske, R. J. Dobbs, C. D. Joye, et al., “Vacuum electronic high power terahertz sources,” IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–75, 2011. DOI: 10.1109/TTHZ.2011.2151610
|
[7] |
J. Y. Xing and J. J. Feng, “Millimeter wave extended interaction device,” Vacuum Electronics, no. 2, pp. 33–37, 2010. DOI: 10.16540/j.cnki.cn11-2485/tn.2010.02.011
|
[8] |
Y. M. Shin, A. Baig, L. R. Barnett, et al., “Modeling investigation of an ultrawideband terahertz sheet beam traveling-wave tube amplifier circuit,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 3213–3218, 2011. DOI: 10.1109/TED.2011.2159842
|
[9] |
T. A. Karetnikova, A. G. Rozhnev, N. M. Ryskin, et al., “Gain analysis of a 0.2-THz traveling-wave tube with sheet electron beam and staggered grating slow wave structure,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2129–2134, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TED.2017.2787960
|
[10] |
B. Steer, A. Roitman, P. Horoyski, et al., “Advantages of extended interaction klystron technology at millimeter and sub- millimeter frequencies,” in Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference, Albuquerque, USA, pp. 1049–1053, 2007.
|
[11] |
X. T. Xu, X. S. Yuan, H. L. Li, et al., “Design of a G-band extended interaction klystron based on a three-coupling-hole structure,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1368–1373, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3138840
|
[12] |
J. Pasour, E. Wright, K. T. Nguyen, et al., “Demonstration of a multikilowatt, solenoidally focused sheet beam amplifier at 94 GHz,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1630–1636, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TED.2013.2295771
|
[13] |
A. Roitman, R. Dobbs, D. Berry, et al., “Advantages of the extended interaction klystron technology at millimeter and sub-millimeter frequencies,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 34th International Conference on Plasma Science, Albuquerque, USA, pp. 666–666, 2007.
|
[14] |
Y. G. Ding, Theory and Computer Simulation of High Power Klystron. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China, pp. 44–47, 2008.
|
[15] |
C. Xu, L. Meng, C. Paoloni, et al., “A 0.35-THz extended interaction oscillator based on overmoded and bi-periodic structure,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 5814–5819, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3108741
|
[16] |
R. J. Li, C. J. Ruan, S. S. Li, et al., “G-band rectangular beam extended interaction klystron based on bi-periodic structure,” IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 498–504, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TTHZ.2019.2927857
|
Parameters | Value (mm) | Parameters | Value (mm) | |
a | 1.17 | h | 0.30 | |
b | 0.20 | P | 0.80 |
Parameter | Value (mm) | Parameter | Value (mm) | |
gz | 0.14 | P1 | 0.60 | |
gx1 | 0.94 | P2 | 0.58 | |
gx2 | 1.18 | P3 | 0.56 |
Parameter | Cavity 1 | Cavity 2 | Cavity 3 |
f (GHz) | 140.95 | 141.73 | 142.14 |
M | 0.612 | 0.632 | 0.626 |
(R/Q)M2 (Ω) | 43.75 | 46.01 | 41.16 |
Q0 | 369.37 | 366.68 | 352.33 |