NIU Ru, CAO Yuan, GE Xiaocheng, et al., “Applying System Thinking to Learn from Accident of Modern Automatic Control Systems,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 409-414, 2014,
Citation:
NIU Ru, CAO Yuan, GE Xiaocheng, et al., “Applying System Thinking to Learn from Accident of Modern Automatic Control Systems,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 409-414, 2014,
NIU Ru, CAO Yuan, GE Xiaocheng, et al., “Applying System Thinking to Learn from Accident of Modern Automatic Control Systems,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 409-414, 2014,
Citation:
NIU Ru, CAO Yuan, GE Xiaocheng, et al., “Applying System Thinking to Learn from Accident of Modern Automatic Control Systems,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 409-414, 2014,
State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 10044, China;
2.
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, National Engineering Research Center of Rail Transportation Operation and Control System, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 10044, China;
3.
Department of Computer Science, University of York, York YO10 5GH, UK
Funds:
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2013JBM125, No.2012JBZ014), National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 plan) (No.2012AA112801), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61110296), and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No.20130009120034).
Modern societies increasingly rely on automatic control systems. These systems are hardly pure technical systems; instead they are complex socio-technical systems, which consist of technical elements and social components. It is necessary to have a systematic approach to analyze these systems because it is growing evidence that accidents from these systems usually have complex causal factors which form an interconnected network of events, rather than a simple cause-effect chain. We take railway Train control systems (TCS) as an example to demonstrate the importance of the socio-technical approach to analyze the system. The paper presents an investigation of recent high-speed railway accident by applying STAMP -one of the most notable socio-technical system analysis techniques, outlines improvements to the system which could avoid similar accidents in the future. We also provide our valuable feedback for the use of STAMP.
C.W. Johnson, Failure in Safety-Critical System: A Handbook of Incident and Accident Reporting, Glasgow University Press, UK, 2003.
Z.H. Qureshi, "A review of accident modeling approaches for complex critical sociotechnical systems", Proceedings of the Twelfth Australian Workshop on Safety Related Programmable Systems, Canberra, Australian, pp.23-35, 2007.
N. Leveson, P. Allen, and M. Storey, "The analysis of a friendly fire accident using a systems model of accidents", Proceedings of the 20th International System Safety Conference, Denver, Colorado, pp.187-209, 2002.
N. Leveson, System Safety Engineering: Back to the Future, MIT Press, USA, 2002.
N. Leveson, "A new accident model for engineering safer systems", Safety Science, Vol.42, No.4, pp.237-270, 2004.
N. Leveson, "Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events", Safety Science, Vol.49, No.1, pp.55-64, 2010.
C.W. Johnson and C.M. Holloway, "A survey of logic formalisms to support mishap analysis", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.80, pp.271-291, 2003.
J. R. Boyd, Destruction and Creation, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1976.
K. S. Park, Human Reliability: Analysis, Prediction, and Prevention of Human Errors, Elsevier, Amersterdam, 1987.
A. Hudoklin and V. Rozman, "Reliability of Railway Traffic Personnel", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.52, pp.165-199, 1996.