Citation: | GENG Yuhui, CAO Xianbin, CUI Huanxi, et al., “Network Element Placement for Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network: A Tutorial,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1013-1024, 2022, doi: 10.1049/cje.2021.00.346 |
With the demand for Internet connectivity in remote areas, the space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) was proposed to achieve ubiquitous coverage and enhance service capabilities of extant terrestrial networks. The paradigm of virtual network element placement (NEP) is applied into SAGIN. It can save energy and operating costs by placing specific network elements (NEs) as software instances. In addition, it helps to provide services in end-to-end networks with its ability to allocate and manage resources flexibly. However, NEP faces some challenges in SAGIN. The network topologies can be dynamic, and links such as the satellite-to-ground and air-to-ground ones are prone to fail. These will make NEP management more complicated. Moreover, the static NEP schemes are hard to accommodate the time-varying traffic. In this context, this work explains the NEP problem in SAGIN from three aspects, i.e., the SAGIN radio access network (RAN), the SAGIN core network (CN), and the SAGIN barrier network (BN). First, the physical and networking architectures of SAGIN are introduced. Then the status of the network element placement and corresponding challenges are described from these two aspects. Finally, this paper discusses future research directions and key technical challenges.
[1] |
H. Cui, J. Zhang, Y. Geng, et al., “Space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) for 6G: Requirements, architecture and challenges,” China Communications, vol.26, no.2, pp.55–61, 2022.
|
[2] |
Y. Xiao, J. Zhang, and Y. Ji, “Energy-efficient DU-CU deployment and lightpath provisioning for service-oriented 5G metro access/aggregation networks,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.39, no.17, pp.5347–5361, 2021. doi: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3069897
|
[3] |
M. Bagaa, T. Taleb, A. Laghrissi, et al., “Coalitional game for the creation of efficient virtual core network slices in 5G mobile systems,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.36, no.3, pp.469–484, 2018. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2018.2815398
|
[4] |
Z. Jia, M. Sheng, J. Li, et al., “VNF-based service provision in software defined LEO satellite networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol.20, no.9, pp.6139–6153, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3072155
|
[5] |
Y. Shi, Y. Cao, J. Liu, et al., “A cross-domain SDN architecture for multi-layered space-terrestrial integrated networks,” IEEE Network, vol.33, no.1, pp.29–35, 2019. doi: 10.1109/MNET.2018.1800191
|
[6] |
T. Li, H. Zhou, H. Luo, et al., “Service: A software defined framework for integrated space-terrestrial satellite communication,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol.17, no.3, pp.703–716, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2017.2732343
|
[7] |
N. Torkzaban, A. Gholami, J. S. Baras, et al., “Joint satellite gateway placement and routing for integrated satellite-terrestrial networks,” 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2020), Dublin, Ireland, DOI: 10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9149175, 2020.
|
[8] |
B. Nemeth, N. Molner, J. Martinperez, et al., “Delay and reliability-constrained VNF placement on mobile and volatile 5G infrastructure,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol.21, no.9, pp.3150–3162, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2021.3055426
|
[9] |
N. Zhang, S. Zhang, P. Yang, et al., “Software defined space-air-ground integrated vehicular networks: Challenges and solutions,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol.55, no.7, pp.101–109, 2017. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1601156
|
[10] |
J. Liu, Y. Shi, Z. M. Fadlullah, et al., “Space-air-ground integrated network: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol.20, no.4, pp.2714–2741, 2018. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2841996
|
[11] |
A. Varasteh, S. Hofmann, N. Deric, et al., “Mobility-aware joint service placement and routing in space-air-ground integrated networks,” 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2019), Shanghai, China, DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2019.8761265, 2019.
|
[12] |
J. Li, W. Shi, H. Wu, et al., “Cost-aware dynamic SFC mapping and scheduling in SDN/NFV-enabled space-air-ground integrated networks for internet of vehicles,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol.9, no.8, pp.5824–5838, 2022. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3058250
|
[13] |
X. Cao, P. Yang, M. Alzenad, et al., “Airborne communication networks: A survey,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.36, no.9, pp.1907–1926, 2018. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2018.2864423
|
[14] |
Z. Xiao, L. Zhu, and X. -G. Xia, “UAV communications with millimeterwave beamforming: Potentials, scenarios, and challenges,” China Communications, vol.17, no.9, pp.147–166, 2020. doi: 10.23919/JCC.2020.09.012
|
[15] |
Z. Xiao, L. Zhu, Y. Liu, et al., “A survey on millimeter-wave beamforming enabled uav communications and networking,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol.24, no.1, pp.557–610, 2022. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2021.3124512
|
[16] |
L. Zhu, J. Zhang, Z. Xiao, et al., “Millimeter-wave full-duplex UAV relay: Joint positioning, beamforming, and power control,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.38, no.9, pp.2057–2073, 2020. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2020.3000879
|
[17] |
L. Zhu, J. Zhang, Z. Xiao, et al., “Millimeter-wave NOMA with user grouping, power allocation and hybrid beamforming,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol.18, no.11, pp.5065–5079, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2019.2932070
|
[18] |
J. Bao, B. Zhao, W. Yu, et al., “OpenSAN: A software-defined satellite network architecture,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol.44, no.4, pp.347–348, 2014. doi: 10.1145/2740070.2631454
|
[19] |
A. Papa, T. De Cola, P. Vizarreta, et al., “Dynamic SDN controller placement in a LEO constellation satellite network,” in Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, pp.206–212, 2018.
|
[20] |
Y. Jia, C. Wu, Z. Li, et al., “Online scaling of nfv service chains across geo-distributed datacenters,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol.26, no.2, pp.699–710, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TNET.2018.2800400
|